Revising Research: The Art of Conformity

If you thought I went far with the reader-based, writer-based argument, please ignore this one.

This week's rant is on changing the research question in order to accomodate your research. It should not be done. Should a lawyer decide to take a case, then turn it down because they're not prepared, it only destroys the credibility of the lawyer. Similarly, should a student change their research question because they don't feel they have the research to support it, their credibility as a researcher and their reputation as one with critical thinking skills is lost. Thinking outside the box is what makes a research good, from making the research question to finding supporting evidence.

Readiness for Research: The Problem With Students Today

In the Wysocki and Lynch reading, the text goes on extensively about the need for a research question. For me, students entering the writing center almost always never prepare one, assuming the assignment sheet handed to them by their professor is enough. While it may give insight to guidance, the student must ultimately conclude one for themselves. Beyond research being a "social action," as described on page 145, it is also a solo action. It requires making a researchable claim and then revising that claim based upon luck with research (topic for next blog posting).